27 причин, почему не стоит

Article 8 1 Violation Of Dog Regulations

The subject is relevant and the answer is, I think, will be interesting to many. It's accepted that there's no regulation of dog walks in the city at the federal level. Indeed, the legislation of such a plan exists only in the regional codes on administrative offences and other local regulations. However, there are standards that are equally equitable for all constituent entities of the FM. They are established by a document adopted at the time of the Soviet Union, a decision of the Council of Ministers of the RSFSR " On the regularization of the content of the Council " dogs and cats in cities RSFSR No. 449 of the year.

Despite its long-standing adoption, the document has not been revoked, i.e. continues to operate throughout Russia. Chapter 3 of the regulation lists the requirements for dog owners to comply with when they leave the pet.

- the removal of a dog on a short leash or in a worm (definitions for puppies under 3 months);

- a walk with a dog only in specially designated places (if the area of the fence is allowed to go out without a curtain and leash);

- The dog walk is allowed 24 hours a day, but at night (from 23.00 to 07.00 hours) the master is obliged to take measures to ensure silence.

It is also prohibited to walk the dog to persons intoxicated.

Responsibility for the violation of these rules is in accordance with local codes of administrative offences of the constituent entities of Russia. However, if this has led to a substantial violation of the rights of others, the situation may extend to the scope of federal legislation, up to the Penal Code. For example, the violation of the rules of absenteeism and the maintenance of dogs is regulated in article 8-1 of the St. Petersburg Act, No. 273-70 " Administrative Offences in St. Petersburg " . The minimum fine under this heading is 1,000 roubles and the maximum is 5,000 roubles.

For example, dogs of fighters and other large species are recognized by their parameters as sources of public danger. Therefore, if such an animal bites a person, it may not only be a charge against the owner of compensation for moral harm in accordance with article 1079 of the Criminal Code, but also a criminal prosecution, provided that the dog damaged or destroyed any property or caused serious health damage (arts. 168 and 118 of the Criminal Code, respectively).

From the wording. The residents of Duchny may ask Denise Aleksandrovich Chetyrboku a question related to a legal situation, with the assistance of... ♪

Share this Post